Litteratur
Barry, Andrew (2006): “Technological zones”, European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2): 239-253.
Beder, Sharon (1991) “Controversy and Closure: Sydney’s Beaches in Crisis”, Social Studies of Science, 21: 223-256
Chang, Hasok (2005) ”Turning an undergraduate [sic!] class into a professional research community”, Teaching in Higher Education 10(3): 387-397
Collins, Harry and Evans, Robert (2007) “The Periodic Table of Expertises: Ubiquitous and Specialist Expertise”, in Rethinking Expertise, Chicago: Uni-versity of Chicago Press, pp.13-44
Horst, Maja & Alan Irwin (2010) “Nations at ease with radical knowledge: on consensus, consensusing and false consensusness” Social Studies of Science 40(1): 105-126
Jacomy, Mathieu (nd) “Web Mapping to Controversy Mapping”, Unpublished Science Po | Médialab manuscript, 1-17.
Latour, Bruno (2005) “From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik – or How to Make Things Public”, in Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, Cambridge: MIT Press: 14-41.
McGoey, Linsey (2009) “Pharmaceutical Controversies and the Performative Value of Uncertainty”, Science as Culture, 18(2): 151-164.
Marres, Noortje (2007) “The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contribu-tions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy”, Social Studies of Science 37(5): 759–80
Marres, Noortje and Weltevrede, Esther. 2013. “Scraping the Social? Issues in live social research”, Journal of Cultural Economy, 6(3), pp. 313-335
Marres, Noortje (2014) “The environmental teapot and other loaded household objects: reconnecting the politics of technology, issues and things”, in Objects and Materials, London: Routledge.
Munk, Anders & Elgaard Jensen, Torben (2014) “Revisiting the histories of mapping: is there a future for a cartographic ethnography?”, Ethnologia Europaea 44(2): 31-47
Rieder, Bernard. 2013. “Studying Facebook via data extraction: the netvizz application”, WebSci may 2-4, Paris, 2013
Rogers, Richard & Marres, Noortje (2000) “Landscaping climate change: a mapping technique for understanding science and technology debates on the World Wide Web”, Public Understanding of Science, 9(2): 141-163.
Rogers, Richard. 2013. Digital Methods. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Kapitel 1 & 2, 19-61.
Severo, Marta & Venturini, Tommaso (2015) “Intangible cultural heritagewebs: comparing national networks with digital methods”, New media & society, 1-20
Sismondo, Sergio (2008) “Science and Technology Studies and an Engaged Programme” in E. J. Hackett et al. (eds.) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. MIT Press: 13-31.
Venturini, Tommaso (2010) “Diving in Magma: How to explore controversies with Actor-Network Theory”, Public Understanding of Science, 19(3): 258-73.
Venturini, Tommaso (2012) “Building on Faults: How to Represent Controversies with Digital Methods”, Public Understanding of Science21(7): 796-812.Paragraph.
Wahlberg, Ayo (2009) “Controversies and scandals”, BIOS News, No. 11: 2-3
Wynne, Brian (1992) “Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science”, Public Understanding of Science, 1(3): 281-304
Other useful sites:
J Philippe Rushton (1998): https://pdf.k0nsl.org/R/Rushton%20Materials/Intell%201998%20Jensen%20Effect.pdf
James R flynn: http://www.jugendsozialarbeit.de/media/raw/flynn1987_What_IQ_tests_really_measure.pdf
Intellgence editorial board: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence/editorial-board
Personality and individual difference editorial board: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/editorial-board
Charles Spearman (1904): https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1412107.pdf
Latour 1987 “Science in action” Harvard university press.
Laurence D. Smith, Lisa A. Best, D. Alan Stubbs, John Johnston and Andrea Bastiani Archibald “Scientific Graphs and the Hierarchy of the Sciences: A Latourian Survey of Inscription Practices” in Social Studies of Science, Vol. 30, No. 1 (Feb., 2000) Published by Sage Publications
Litteratur chosen by the students
C. Spearman 1904 “"GENERAL INTELLIGENCE," OBJECTIVELY DETERMINED AND MEASURED” American Journal of Psychology 15. (37 pages)
H. Rindermann & J. Thompson “Ability rise in NAEP and narrowing ethnic gaps?” Intelligence 41 (2013) 821–831 (10 pages)
I. J. Deary et. al. 2000 “The Stability of Individual Differences in Mental Ability from Childhood to Old Age: Follow-up of the 1932 Scottish Mental Survey“ Intelligence 28(1): 48-55 (8 pages)
J. Pfeffer 2013 “Fundamentals of Visualizing Communication Networks”. China Communications: 82-90. (9 pages)
J. R. Flynn “Massive IQ Gains in 14 Nations: What IQ Tests Really Measure” Psychological Bulletin 1987, Vol. 101, No. 2,171-191 (21 pages)
Jasanoff, Sheila (1998) “The Eye of Everyman: Witnessing DNA in the Simpson Trial”, Social Studies of Science, 28(5-6): 713-740 (28 pages)
M. Savage and R. Burrows Sociology 2007 “The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology” Sage Publications, Ltd. Sociology Vol. 41, No. 5: 885-899 (15 pages)
R. Lynn & T. Vanhanen 2002 “Intelligence and the Wealth and Poverty of Nations” (40 pages)
U. Neisser et. al. “Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns” 1996 by the American Psychological Association, Vol. 51, No. 2, 77-101 (25 pages)
W. T. Dickens & J. R. Flynn 2001 “Heritability Estimates Versus Large Environmental Effects: The IQ Paradox Resolved” Psychological Review 2001. Vol. 108, No. 2. 346-369 (24 pages)
Barry, Andrew (2006): “Technological zones”, European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2): 239-253.
Beder, Sharon (1991) “Controversy and Closure: Sydney’s Beaches in Crisis”, Social Studies of Science, 21: 223-256
Chang, Hasok (2005) ”Turning an undergraduate [sic!] class into a professional research community”, Teaching in Higher Education 10(3): 387-397
Collins, Harry and Evans, Robert (2007) “The Periodic Table of Expertises: Ubiquitous and Specialist Expertise”, in Rethinking Expertise, Chicago: Uni-versity of Chicago Press, pp.13-44
Horst, Maja & Alan Irwin (2010) “Nations at ease with radical knowledge: on consensus, consensusing and false consensusness” Social Studies of Science 40(1): 105-126
Jacomy, Mathieu (nd) “Web Mapping to Controversy Mapping”, Unpublished Science Po | Médialab manuscript, 1-17.
Latour, Bruno (2005) “From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik – or How to Make Things Public”, in Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, Cambridge: MIT Press: 14-41.
McGoey, Linsey (2009) “Pharmaceutical Controversies and the Performative Value of Uncertainty”, Science as Culture, 18(2): 151-164.
Marres, Noortje (2007) “The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contribu-tions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy”, Social Studies of Science 37(5): 759–80
Marres, Noortje and Weltevrede, Esther. 2013. “Scraping the Social? Issues in live social research”, Journal of Cultural Economy, 6(3), pp. 313-335
Marres, Noortje (2014) “The environmental teapot and other loaded household objects: reconnecting the politics of technology, issues and things”, in Objects and Materials, London: Routledge.
Munk, Anders & Elgaard Jensen, Torben (2014) “Revisiting the histories of mapping: is there a future for a cartographic ethnography?”, Ethnologia Europaea 44(2): 31-47
Rieder, Bernard. 2013. “Studying Facebook via data extraction: the netvizz application”, WebSci may 2-4, Paris, 2013
Rogers, Richard & Marres, Noortje (2000) “Landscaping climate change: a mapping technique for understanding science and technology debates on the World Wide Web”, Public Understanding of Science, 9(2): 141-163.
Rogers, Richard. 2013. Digital Methods. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Kapitel 1 & 2, 19-61.
Severo, Marta & Venturini, Tommaso (2015) “Intangible cultural heritagewebs: comparing national networks with digital methods”, New media & society, 1-20
Sismondo, Sergio (2008) “Science and Technology Studies and an Engaged Programme” in E. J. Hackett et al. (eds.) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. MIT Press: 13-31.
Venturini, Tommaso (2010) “Diving in Magma: How to explore controversies with Actor-Network Theory”, Public Understanding of Science, 19(3): 258-73.
Venturini, Tommaso (2012) “Building on Faults: How to Represent Controversies with Digital Methods”, Public Understanding of Science21(7): 796-812.Paragraph.
Wahlberg, Ayo (2009) “Controversies and scandals”, BIOS News, No. 11: 2-3
Wynne, Brian (1992) “Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science”, Public Understanding of Science, 1(3): 281-304
Other useful sites:
J Philippe Rushton (1998): https://pdf.k0nsl.org/R/Rushton%20Materials/Intell%201998%20Jensen%20Effect.pdf
James R flynn: http://www.jugendsozialarbeit.de/media/raw/flynn1987_What_IQ_tests_really_measure.pdf
Intellgence editorial board: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence/editorial-board
Personality and individual difference editorial board: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/editorial-board
Charles Spearman (1904): https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1412107.pdf
Latour 1987 “Science in action” Harvard university press.
Laurence D. Smith, Lisa A. Best, D. Alan Stubbs, John Johnston and Andrea Bastiani Archibald “Scientific Graphs and the Hierarchy of the Sciences: A Latourian Survey of Inscription Practices” in Social Studies of Science, Vol. 30, No. 1 (Feb., 2000) Published by Sage Publications
Litteratur chosen by the students
C. Spearman 1904 “"GENERAL INTELLIGENCE," OBJECTIVELY DETERMINED AND MEASURED” American Journal of Psychology 15. (37 pages)
H. Rindermann & J. Thompson “Ability rise in NAEP and narrowing ethnic gaps?” Intelligence 41 (2013) 821–831 (10 pages)
I. J. Deary et. al. 2000 “The Stability of Individual Differences in Mental Ability from Childhood to Old Age: Follow-up of the 1932 Scottish Mental Survey“ Intelligence 28(1): 48-55 (8 pages)
J. Pfeffer 2013 “Fundamentals of Visualizing Communication Networks”. China Communications: 82-90. (9 pages)
J. R. Flynn “Massive IQ Gains in 14 Nations: What IQ Tests Really Measure” Psychological Bulletin 1987, Vol. 101, No. 2,171-191 (21 pages)
Jasanoff, Sheila (1998) “The Eye of Everyman: Witnessing DNA in the Simpson Trial”, Social Studies of Science, 28(5-6): 713-740 (28 pages)
M. Savage and R. Burrows Sociology 2007 “The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology” Sage Publications, Ltd. Sociology Vol. 41, No. 5: 885-899 (15 pages)
R. Lynn & T. Vanhanen 2002 “Intelligence and the Wealth and Poverty of Nations” (40 pages)
U. Neisser et. al. “Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns” 1996 by the American Psychological Association, Vol. 51, No. 2, 77-101 (25 pages)
W. T. Dickens & J. R. Flynn 2001 “Heritability Estimates Versus Large Environmental Effects: The IQ Paradox Resolved” Psychological Review 2001. Vol. 108, No. 2. 346-369 (24 pages)